Related topics

Clive's WG14 meeting report
I'm trying to edit a largish (75 Mb) with vi and keep getting the error message Tmp file too large.=20 [...] I keep promising myself I'll learn emacs, but for now at least I'm quite Built it with gcc-3.2 in 64 bit mode and got errors first time around. Had a look at what was different about the 64 bit ports.

generic_file_llseek() broken?
Nathan Strong gbl...@gmail.com adobe acrobat windows 2GB is actually an absolute limit in all but the most modern PCs (the 64-bit systems), because 2GB is the largest signed integer you can represent in 32 bits. Nathan.

> 2GB "file too large", AIX 4.2, perl 5.001, not "ulimit"
If your numbers aren't too big you could try the Currency data type, which is a 64-bit integer with fixed scaling to allow 4 decimal places. On Tue, 9 Mar 2004 07:21:29 -0800, "Jane Fornoff" <anonym...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: I would like to import a text file containing large integers (of the order

HDF vs. netCDF
+dm-1-module-param.patch +dm-2-blk.patch +dm-3-use-hex.patch +dm-4-64-bit-ioctls.patch +dm-5-missing-include.patch +dm-6-sector_div.patch Fix mtrr-related hang intel8x0-cleanup.patch intel8x0 cleanups bio-too-big-fix.patch Fix raid "bio too big" failures ppa-fix.patch ppc fix linux-isp-2.patch

max page file on 64 bit server exhange 2007?
So we can safely say that no disk is too big for the ext2 filesystem. This "64-bit file system" is a buzzword that sounds very nice but doesn't mean anything at all. Does it mean that the databus to the harddisk is 64 bit? No, that has nothing to do with the file system itself. Does it mean that file systems which

64-bit Unix
discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: "Soap" wrote: Hi, It is my understanding that with 64 bit there is no limit of 4 GB anymore, am I wrong? When running the Exchange Analyzer I got a warning about the size of my servers pagefile. It was too big. If the Exchange Analyzer determines that the value for the

2.6.x BSD Process Accounting w/High UID
mike...@my-deja.com comp lang c I have aC program which is programmed to create a 4 GB file of data. I have run this on many flavours of Unix and it bombs out with a "file too large" error at the 2GB mark. Unices include Solaris7 (64 bit Sparc) and Unixware 7.1 (32 bit intel). Is this a limitation of Unix or of the

2GB file limit ftp/scp Linux kernel 2.4.2 problem
[EOVERFLOW] - Value too large for data type. This can happen for a seek. The resulting file offset would be a value which cannot be represented correctly in an object of the given type. Technically, the offset isn't too large for a 64-bit datatype, but it is too large for an underlying filesystem datatype,

opinions wanted regarding 64bits
Elan Shudnow Elan_Shud...@discussions.microsoft.com microsoft public exchange admin "Soap" wrote: Hi, It is my understanding that with 64 bit there is no limit of 4 GB anymore, am I wrong? When running the Exchange Analyzer I got a warning about the size of my servers pagefile. It was too big.

File too large to open?
... that the application isn't prepared to handle 64-bit stat values and is therefore returning an error in the library code rather than at the system call level. The file is really too big. I think it's a bad idea assuming the file does not exist when stat fails, errno should be checked every time. -- ciao, Marco.

An article in BYTE, ignorance amazes me.
No. The library calls are coded into the application. It still calls the old 32 bit ones rather than the 64 bit ones. You can, however, create larger Sybase devices on raw devices if you are using ASE 11.9.2 on Solaris 2.6 and above. ASE 12 supports larger files as well. -am.

OpenVMS 7.1, still a 16 bit OS
That's why NT supports a file system capable of dealing with ~2^64 bytes of data/partition. Not that 2^64 is required for a desktop....2^32 was too small and 2^64 is *WAY* too big (for now). I'm sure when the number of applications making use of 64-bit address space becomes ubiquitous, there will be a 64-bit

File too large ??
Temporary storage is either in RAM, or thrown into swap space when it gets too big. In this new system the pathnames, device and partition are all unnecessary; one merely needs a block64. I'm not sure what the GUI would look like but I did fire up Squeak the other night. Am I understanding you at all correctly?

An article in BYTE, ignorance amazes me.
Is the makefile too big? 2.7 MS Windows 2.7.1 MS Windows GSview cannot execute GSWIN. 3 Device specific Questions 3.2 The spacing of characters / words / margins on the display is wrong, Versions of Ghostscript through 2.6.1 have a number of bugs that prevent them from working properly on 64-bit architectures.

how to Recompile gzip to support 64 bit file sizes.
Todd T...@discussions.microsoft.com microsoft public exchange admin "Soap" wrote: Hi, It is my understanding that with 64 bit there is no limit of 4 GB anymore, am I wrong? When running the Exchange Analyzer I got a warning about the size of my servers pagefile. It was too big. If the Exchange Analyzer determines

file's size too large ??
People may say "but we can resolve it closer to the time", but they also said that about 32 bit file sizes. Look at the trouble that Linux is still Oh- yeah- this is too big of an issue to really turn into a bikeshed discussion- this is more like "shall we build a 5000 megawatt nuclear power plant next month?

2.6.0-test2-mm3
ponnusamy balasubramanian bponn...@bmc.com comp unix aix Hi Barnette, I suppose gunzip is not using the 64 bit system calls available in AIX 4.2 like open64, If you have the gunzip source code search for these calls or _LARGE_FILES. thanks, pons Gary Barnette wrote: Getting "File too large" error from gunzip on

max page file on 64 bit server exhange 2007?
... patch large scsi discs are detected and sized correctly; and it's possible create block devices using raid up to 16TB on 32-bit platforms, and as large as you like on 64-bit platforms. Fixes the loop device to allow large backing files or devices, and to fail gracefully if the backing file is too large.

max page file on 64 bit server exhange 2007?
Z it unzips until the size of nt is around 2.1 Gb and then terminates and gives an error "gzip: Unable to unzip file too large". I have also tried uncompress. They say it's a problem of gzip which can be solved by recompiling the program using an option to support 64 bit file sizes. I need information about how

What features must scientific languages have ...
It's indicative that the open/read/write/seek routines Python is linked against use 32-bit sizes and offsets rather than 64-bit ones. I don't have any problem creating/opening/seeking/reading 4GB files using 1.5.2 on Solaris 2.7 x86 (admittedly with a big hole in the middle - this machine doesn't have that much